Search

O&P Library > Orthotics and Prosthetics > 1957, Vol 11, Num 4 > pp. 33 - 35

Orthotics and ProstheticsThis journal was digitally reproduced with permission from the American Orthotic & Prosthetic Association (AOPA).

Funding for this project was provided by the American Academy of Orthotists and Prosthetists through a grant from the US Department of Education (grant number H235K080004). However, this does not necessarily represent the policy of the Department of Education, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government. For more information about the Academy please visit our website at www.oandp.org.



You can help expand the
O&P Virtual Library with a
tax-deductible contribution.

View as PDF

with original layout

A New Plastic Soft Socket for Below Knee Prosthesis

Waldemar Schoene, C.P.&O. 

For many years some of the most troublesome problems encountered by the prosthetist have arisen from the lack of a satisfactory material for soft sockets in below knee prostheses. About ten years ago, stimulated by difficulties in fitting and maintaining a client with a body weight of about 220 pounds, we began an intensive investigation of available materials, finally developing a soft but resilient plastic sheet which we believe far superior to any of the other materials currently available for fabrication of soft sockets. In many respects, we believe, it offers the definitive answer to this annoying problem.

Experience with 850 cases, both veteran and civilian, over the last six years has been highly gratifying. This new soft socket (Flexolimb, Bardach-Schoene Co., Inc., Chicago) is made of a plasticized polyvinyl chloride acetate faced with a smooth fabric. It is now being produced under contract to the U.S. Government and, under certain conditions, is available to the profession generally.

Every competent prosthetist is familiar with the theoretical criteria for a satisfactory below knee soft socket. The material should be soft enough to cushion sensitive stumps comfortably, but it should also be tough and flexible, and resist shrinking, warping, or other distortion. In addition to retaining its strength and resilience with aging, it should offer the maximum possible resistance to moisture, grease, acids, or alkalis.

When measured by these standards, soft sockets conventionally used in the past have manifested certain inadequacies with which both the prosthetist and the below knee amputee-in fact, all members of the rehabilitation team-have become acutely aware. These inadequacies probably have presented the crucial difficulty in fitting and servicing below knee clientele. Among the materials tried have been sponge and foam rubber faced with soft horsehide; sheet rubber with leather covering; rubber alone; vulcanized rubber latex; fibrous materials such as felt with binders or surface coatings.

Although initial results might be good with sponge or foam rubber, the cushioning effect is quickly lost because of the tendency of these substances to pack and distort. Sheet rubber, on the other hand, retains its shape but its cushioning effect is negligible; moreover, perspiration enters the leather facing to hasten deterioration and present insoluble problems of cleaning. Vulcanized rubber latex hardens when molded to form and becomes progressively harder with use. Felt soon packs down, losing its cushioning capacity and becoming displaced. Rubber placed directly against the skin not only deteriorates from body acids, but retains bodily moisture and heat, and, because of its non-skid properties, causes skin irritation and abrasions.

In patients with prominent bony structure the drawbacks presented by these materials become increasingly apparent. The heavy patient referred to at the beginning of this report, whose weight rested on a stump which extended only 3 inches below the tibial plateau, experienced a succession of difficulties such as stump sores, swelling, and acute discomfort due to the pressure of his weight. Several fittings were required and refitting of three or four stump sockets.

In the course of our quest for a better material, it was suggested that we investigate a plastic used as a lining and shock-absorber for denial plates where sensitive gums were a complication. This plastic material held forth promise, but it was only 1/16 inch thick and 3 square inches in area-obviously not even remotely adapted to the purpose we had in mind. Needed was a sheet of sufficient thickness and surface area to cover and cushion a stump socket properly, and no such material was available. It appeared that our only recourse was to make it ourselves.

Acquiring the raw materials-resin and plasticizer-did not present a problem. However, the plastisol had to be fused and molded under heat and pressure into sheets of desired size and thickness. Here we encountered difficulty because no such presses were available. After consultation with engineers, we had the necessary capital equipment constructed: a hydraulic press with electrically heated pressure plates thermostatically controlled.

Since the plastic itself has non-skid properties similar to rubber, its abrasive action on the skin would be similar. To avoid this, the plastic is faced with a smooth fabric bonded to the plastic sheet under heat and pressure. In this way it becomes an integral part of the material, offering a smooth surface over which the skin slides easily and comfortably. This surfacing material is waterproof, and its consequent ability to resist perspiration not only prevents deterioration but gives obvious hygienic advantages as well. There are no chemical irritants which might induce topical dermatitis.

In order to facilitate adjustments for shrinkage of the stump and possible loss or gain in weight by the amputee, the sheets are produced in thicknesses varying from 1/8 inch to 7/16 inch.

Satisfactory results with this new soft socket presuppose proper use. In making this material available to the profession, therefore, we feel justified in imposing the condition that any prosthetic establishment desiring it must be adequately instructed in its application. Briefly, this involves recessing the socket alter its preliminary fitting, adapting the plastic socket to the recessed portion, bonding it with strong adhesive, and setting, preferably with radiant (infrared) heat. The heat also serves to soften the plastic so that it can be molded accurately to the contour of the socket. Properly applied, it will maintain an even degree of softness throughout its thickness without packing, shifting or loss of elasticity.

In the Spring of 1951, the first two soft socket wearers were introduced at the Chicago Veterans Administration Clinic. One of these was the client mentioned at the beginning of this paper. After he was fitted with a soft socket of this type, all unusual difficulties ceased. Reports of other clients using the plastic soft sockets are enthusiastic. One man who previously had to make frequent calls at our facility for re-lining and readjustment of his socket was finally fitted with the Flexolimb type before he made an extended trip to South America. On his return, he said that despite the heat and humidity characteristic of that climate, he experienced no difficulty with his prosthesis.

In our experience in fitting below knee suction sockets, we have found that in the selected cases where such sockets are possible, the use of this material facilitates the essential critical fitting. Galdik * enumerates some of the usual difficulties encountered by amputees who have worn below knee suction sockets: edema, insufficient suction, pressure points, ingrown hairs, water blisters, and contact dermatitis.

The problems of edema, suction, and pressure points hinge on fitting-a process which would appear to be simplified by use of a plastic which can be easily molded under radiant heat and which is available in a range of thicknesses. More important still, the critical fit necessary for adequate suction without stump damage can be maintained better with the plastic soft socket than with any other currently available.

As for stump irritation, we have not encountered this annoying phenomenon in any of our own cases. In fact, our own happy general experience with the plastic soft socket would indicate that use of Flexolimb has been a major factor not only in simplifying troublesome problems of fitting, but also in maintaining a satisfied, complaint-free clientele.

Note:The Bardach-Schoene Co. of Chicago has received a number of inquiries about the soft cushion plastic socket for below-knee legs. Prosthetic facilities wishing to use this socket may send a prosthetist to Bardach-Schoene for a course in fitting the socket to the prosthesis. The course covers approximately 16 hours and an instruction fee is charged. This course is necessary to obtain best results and for the protection of the patient. Bardach-Schoene has had over ten years' experience in the development of this plastic soft socket.


Waldemar Schoene, a native of Germany received his training in artificial limbs and braces there, and came to the United States in 1926. Through the years since then, he has been active in the making and fitting of braces and appliances for both upper and lower extremities. Mr. Schoene established his own business in September, 1935 and is now president of the Company. He is a Certified Orthotist and Prosthetist, and attended the Course in Upper Extremity Appliances at the University of California, and the New York University Course in Above-Knee Prosthetics.

References:

  1. Galdik, John, Below-Knee Suction Socket, Orthopedic and Prosthetic Appliance Journal, Dec. 1955, 43-46.

O&P Library > Orthotics and Prosthetics > 1957, Vol 11, Num 4 > pp. 33 - 35

The O&P Virtual Library is a project of the Digital Resource Foundation for the Orthotics & Prosthetics Community. Contact Us | Contribute