O&P Library > Orthotics and Prosthetics > 1966, Vol 20, Num 3 > pp. 245 - 247

Orthotics and ProstheticsThis journal was digitally reproduced with permission from the American Orthotic & Prosthetic Association (AOPA).

Funding for this project was provided by the American Academy of Orthotists and Prosthetists through a grant from the US Department of Education (grant number H235K080004). However, this does not necessarily represent the policy of the Department of Education, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government. For more information about the Academy please visit our website at

You can help expand the
O&P Virtual Library with a
tax-deductible contribution.

View as PDF

with original layout

Fitting of a Unilateral Congenital Deformity of the Lower Extremity

Rudolf Thys *

Director, Dr. Carlos Bustamente B.

Translated by Kurt Marschall, C.P. Syracuse, New York

Translated and reprinted with the permission of the author and publisher from Orthopaedie-Technik, Wiesbaden, Germany, January 1964, pp. 13-14.

Every congenital deformity presents its own individual problem. The following case was recently fitted with a prosthesis at this hospital.

Fig. 1 and Fig. 2 show the below-knee portion of the deformed leg in a frontal view. The two illustrations clearly show the static alignment problems present that had to be taken into consideration. In a vertical position of the below-knee segment, the leg indicates an external rotation of the hip joint with the result that the knee joint points in a lateral direction.

Fig. 2 shows the position of the knee joint and femur in a normal alignment; however, the below-knee portion of the extremity is then extremely abducted. Fig. 3 illustrates the extremity from a lateral view with its typical externally rotated position.

These were the main factors that had to be taken into consideration at the time of prosthetic fitting.

After all contours and bony protuberances had been carefully marked, a plaster cast was taken similar to the one for a P.T.B. prosthesis. It was of foremost importance to plan the proper support of the tibial condyles to prevent further external rotation. The prosthesis was to be fitted, if possible, without side joints and corset. After the plaster positive was carefully prepared, a socket was fabricated from polyester-resin, without the use of the vacuum system. In the construction of the prosthesis an Otto Bock SACH foot was used.

Fig. 4 shows the prosthesis from a frontal view. From this photograph one can see that the patella is almost completely imbedded in the socket and that the tibial condyles are well supported. Thus we were able to eliminate the corset.

Fig. 5 shows the alignment of the prosthesis in slight flexion.

Fig. 6 illustrates the gait phase.

The donning and holding in place of the prosthesis was accomplished by a posterior opening similar to a Pirogoff prosthesis. The fitting itself was completed without any difficulties.

At a final clinic team meeting with the orthopedic surgeons, it was contemplated to amputate the foot in the near future (about one or two years) and convert the extremity into a well-padded below-knee stump. It was the opinion of the group that the present prosthetic fitting would, over a prolonged period of time, have a detrimental effect on the knee joint. It was felt that fitting with a regular P.T.B. prosthesis after surgical conversion could be carried out better from a standpoint of static alignment and cosmesis.

O&P Library > Orthotics and Prosthetics > 1966, Vol 20, Num 3 > pp. 245 - 247

The O&P Virtual Library is a project of the Digital Resource Foundation for the Orthotics & Prosthetics Community. Contact Us | Contribute